Newsfilter article unlocker

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Fact Set fourth quarter and fiscal 2026 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in the listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask the question during the session, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to speaker today, Kevin Toomey, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to FACSET's fourth quarter and fiscal 2026 earnings call. Before we begin, the slides we referenced during this presentation can be found through the webcast on the Investor Relations section of our website at facset.com. A replay of today's call will be available on our website. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call to questions. The call is scheduled to last for one hour. To be fair to everyone, please limit yourself to one question. You may re-enter the queue for additional follow-up questions, which we will take if time permits. Before we discuss our results, I encourage all listeners to review the legal notice on slide two. Discussions on this call may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning these risks and uncertainties can be found in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Our slide presentation and discussions on this call will include certain non-GAAP financial measures. For such measures, reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are in the appendix to the presentation and in our earnings release issued earlier today, both of which can be find on our website at investor.faxset.com. During this call, unless otherwise noted, relative performance metrics reflect changes as compared to the respective fiscal 2025 period. Joining me today are Sanok Vishwanathan, Chief Executive Officer, and Josh Warren, Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the discussion over to Sanok. Thank you, Kevin. Good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining the call. Fiscal 2026 was strong. We achieved the highest Q4 ASV performance in FACTSET's history. For the year, organic ASV grew at 7%, or $168 million, to $2.56 billion, exceeding the high end of our guidance, with robust growth across all regions and client types. For fiscal 2026, adjusted operating margin was 34.5%, reflecting the investments we made this past year. Adjusted diluted EPS was $18.01, up 6% year-over-year. It was an important year for FactSet. We launched several new products. Trusted FactSet data through MCP servers, multi-asset class risk models, new capabilities in our quant modeling environment, and agents for banking, buy-side, and wealth management clients were just a few. We reorganized around a unified product organization. strengthened our leadership bench and sharpened commercial execution to accelerate top line growth while boosting workforce productivity with the help of ai to improve operating leverage and drive future margin expansion the more widely our clients deploy ai the more valuable are our foundational strengths connected data embedded workflows service excellence and broad and deep distribution as we see in this quarter's adoption engagement and growth trends our client wins this quarter demonstrate the strength of our platform as leading global financial institutions consolidate more of their data workflows and mission critical operations with factset our strategic investments are making an impact securing six and seven figure deals involving new products such as AI for banking, MCP, deep sector content, trading solutions, and real-time data. In banking, we continue to win significant mandates by displacing major competitors. Just three months after launching Faxit AI for Banking, a bulge bracket investment bank selected our full agentic banking stack across its global footprint. We have since signed additional AI for banking deals, indicating wider adoption. We also won a mandate to displace a long-standing incumbent at a large regional bank, a deal that includes MCP and deep sector content with a clear path for expansion. On the buy side, we secured several significant eight-figure enterprise deals. We renewed a large global asset manager in a new enterprise deal that includes transactional services, MCP, and data feeds. Another global asset manger expanded its Managed Services Agreement into new capabilities for end-to-end performance and holdings-based analysis for equity, multi-asset, and fixed income. We also displaced an incumbent at a European quant fund with our data feeds and programmatic environment API. In wealth management, we secured two major competitive displacements across workstations and real-time data feeds. With these wins, we now serve Canada's five largest wealth managers and have also gained traction among independent firms. We also expanded our relationship with a leading UK wealth manager with selected Faxit's performance reporting solution, showcasing the strength of our solutions across the end-to-end portfolio lifecycle. AI-related solutions made up a double-digit share of new ASV this quarter, exceeding fiscal 2025's total AI contribution. And we're seeing early evidence that it is complementing our existing product offerings. Among clients with an established workstation relationship, the majority increased total ASV after adding MCP. Our client wins throughout the year demonstrate that our investments are paying off. We are attracting new clients and expanding our existing relationships. Q4 capped a year of solid execution against the three priorities guiding our business transformation. commercial excellence, productivity improvement, and long-term strategy. We are delivering stronger commercial outcomes, real productivity gains, and an AI strategy that is differentiating FactSet in the market. The impact of our commercial excellence initiative is clear with strong new business growth, continued ASV retention of over 95%, and strong expansion. Data ASV delivered through direct feeds, APIs, MCP, or through a partner a partner continued to grow at double digits with ai adoption driving new logo acquisition and enterprise adoption boosting retention and expansion among our largest clients we continue to accelerate the shift of our business model from seed-based contracts to flexible enterprise agreements in q4 the majority of renewed asv was secured as enterprise agreements or in contracts with terms of three years or longer, increasing average contract length by roughly 30%, while broadly preserving pricing. This underscores how our flexible engagement model is leading to longer duration, higher value contracts. Second, we continue to streamline operations and reduce complexity as we scale our productivity initiative. This translated into net headcount reduction in f526 real sign of operating leverage inherent in our business we are taking the freed up capacity redeploying most of it into new product and growth opportunities and returning a portion of it to the bottom line in q4 we continue to scale ai across our product and engineering teams expanding ai enabled projects by roughly 40 percent the token governance and and optimization measures we put in place last quarter are driving further efficiency gains. Token use related to coding assistance grew more than 80% quarter on quarter, with token spend growing at only half that pace. A key area of investment in our data refinery is private markets data. In Q4, we re-engineered a pipeline that integrates and delivers content from dozens of providers, covering millions of global private companies. Platform consolidation combined with agent-assisted engineering cut processing times in this area by more than 75%, halved the onboarding effort, and more than doubled delivery speed, freeing engineering resources for document enrichment and data labeling that further strengthen our AI foundation. The client-assist agent I talked about a couple of quarters ago has been fully rolled out to all clients as of Q4 and now resolves over 30% of all user-initiated requests without human interaction. These initiatives are all driving faster delivery and improved quality at a lower cost. We expect these to scale in FY27 and further enhance our operating leverage. We are rolling out a differentiated AI strategy that leverages the high quality of our connected data and the deep embedding of our analytics and software and client workflows. Our strategy is resonating with clients and our momentum is strong. For example, MCP adoption is accelerating across clients of every size. Over 650 clients were actively engaged under contracts or trials to consume our data sets through MCP as of fiscal year-end. API call volume continues to expand rapidly, with Q4 volumes at seven times the level we experienced last quarter. We expect this to continue as we make more data sets available through MCPs. In Q4, we launched our first analytics MCP, extending our market-leading portfolio analytics into agentic workflows. We believe this will unlock tremendous value for buy-side clients as they deploy agents in performance measurement, risk, and reporting. And it's not just MCP. Clients using our AI solutions grew their ASV twice as fast as the rest of our client base in Q4. We continue to invest in real-time data and pricing and reference data as clients prepare for 23x5 trading. Our acquisition of BCC Group, a leading platform for distributing and managing real- time feeds, significantly expands our addressable market by opening up new opportunities across the real-times data ecosystem. We'll go deeper into the strategy and how it translates into our medium-term growth and financial targets at our upcoming Investor Day on November 10. I'm looking forward to sharing more there. I'll now turn the call over to Josh to discuss our Q4 and Fiscal 26 performance in more detail, as well as our FY27 guidance. Thank you, Sanok. As Sanok outlined, Fiscal 26 was a transformational year for FactSet. We accelerated growth while strengthening the firm's foundation through initiatives that sharpened our go-to-market approach and improved productivity and efficiency across the organization. I'll highlight three areas as I walk through our results for Q4, the fiscal year, and a framework for our FY27 outlook. First, our client base. Its quality and breadth form the most meaningful growth opportunities we see. Strengthening client relationships and expanding capabilities position us well entering FY27. Next, translating that growth into durable, compounding free cash flow across market cycles. We expect to see enhanced operating leverage become more evident in improving FY27 operating margins. FACSET's margins compressed during FY26 for two primary reasons. A series of structural investments previously discussed, including modernizing our infrastructure and strengthening cybersecurity and resilience, and the output of accelerating ASV to record levels. Revenue that ASV delivers is recognized over time, while performance-based incentive compensation is expensed up front. Finally, our flexible balance sheet and disciplined capital allocation approach, which support our strategy going forward. To recap our results for the fiscal fourth quarter, at the end of August, ASV exceeded $2.56 billion, representing 7% organic growth and acceleration of more than 125 basis points over the comparable rate in 2025. We generated $86 million of organic ASV during the quarter, our largest quarter ever. Revenue grew more than 6% to over $634 million. Our adjusted operating income was $209 million, a 33% margin, and adjusted EPS grew 11% to $4.52. To review our results for fiscal 2026 overall, we generated 168 million of organic ASV above the high end of our guidance range. In dollar terms, that represents a more than 30% increase over the organic ASP generated in FY25, And in growth rate terms, FACSAT's best results in the last three years. Full-year revenue reached $2,476,000,000. A 6.7% growth over 2025. Also above the high end of the guidance range. Our adjusted operating income was $855,000., representing a 34.5% margin. Approximately 180 basis points below 2025 and within our guidance range, and adjusted EPS grew 6% to $18.01, also above the high end of the guidance range. FactSet serves more than 9,200 clients in over 80 countries with approximately three-quarters of our top 100 clients having been with us for more than 20 years, including 95 of the top 100 global asset managers, 38 out of the Top 40 wealth managers, and 90% of the TOP 50 global investment banks. Adoption of AI is at varying stages of maturity across our client base, and the boldest are partnering with FactSet to reimagine core workflows and essential processes. For Q4-26, organic ASV accelerated to 7% year-over-year, an increase of 86 million during the quarter. For the full year, 168 million of organic ASB represents a record outcome. Growth was evident across all client types and regions. By client type, Q4 results, or institutional buy-side organic ASV, grew 5%, an acceleration of approximately 100 basis points from Q4 2025. Across both buy- side and sell-side, our dealmakers category saw organic ASB grow 9%, approximately doubling its growth rate from a year ago. Wealth grew 9% organic ASV, and our market infrastructure category grew 8%. Every region grew faster in Q4 than it did a year ago, with organic ASB accelerating to 7% in the Americas, 5% in EMEA, and over 10% in Asia Pacific, our fastest-growing region. Focusing on our Q4 results and reflecting broad base strength, revenues grew 6.3% year-over-year or 7.1% on a like-for-like basis. Q4 adjusted operating margin was 33% compared to 33.8% last year. As I noted earlier, periods of faster ASV growth can temporarily compress margins in any quarter since the incremental ASV is not yet reflected in revenue. This was the case in Q4 where compensation-related expenses increased 9% year-over-year, driven by performance-based arrangements not due to additional headcount. During Q4, we reduced overall headcount as part of our efforts to streamline our operating footprint, marking the first annual headcount decline following several years of growth. Earlier this month, we implemented additional headcount reductions. We recognize the impact of these decisions on those affected, but believe they position us to operate more efficiently while strengthening our business for the long term. We remain focused on investing in product development and client service and expect these cost efficiencies to free up capital for client-facing innovation. Higher earnings and a lower share count led to an 11% increase year-over-year to $4.52 in our adjusted earnings per share. Consistent long-term free cash flow generation is a hallmark of our model and positions us to be a durable compounder across market cycles. Free cash flow was $177 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, roughly in line with the prior year period. For the full fiscal year, free cash flow was $707 million, an increase of over 14%. Our free cash flow during Q4 reflected the one-time restructuring costs associated with right-sizing certain teams alongside productivity improvements that we expect to improve our margin and free cashflow generation over time. We expect the efficiency gained to reduce complexity and operational risk while improving overall quality, leading to a better overall outcome for clients and shareholders. We anticipate our free cash flow during Q127 will reflect similar temporary impacts from productivity investments that we expect will benefit operating leverage and free cash flow over time. Our disciplined framework prioritizes organic investments in high growth projects as our top priority for capital allocation. We prioritize opportunities with visibility into return on capital above a demanding hurdle rate. We then consider inorganic activity that meets our strategic and financial criteria and return excess capital to shareholders. Where we do look inorganically, we often source opportunities from our own ecosystem. Because of our reach, we are typically acquiring or investing in firms we know well, partners whose technology is running alongside ours, and whose teams we have already worked with. We believe that lowers integration risk. For example, following the close of Q4, we announced the acquisition of the BCC Group, a Frankfurt-based data infrastructure company that augments our real-time data offering to allow for integrated entitlement management. We've worked together on multiple deployments and are excited about the future opportunities. The strong cash generation of our business allows us to return any excess capital to our shareholders. During Q4, we continued our repurchase activity, buying back approximately 552,000 shares for $138 million. For the full year, FY26, FACSAT more than doubled its buyback activity with approximately $644 million of shares repurchased, reducing shares outstanding by almost 7 percent. In total, we returned over $800 million to shareholders in fiscal 2026 through dividends and repurchases, representing an annual increase of over 75 percent. We believe that returning capital to shareholders is an important output of our highly predictable business model, combined with improving operational efficiency and consistent free cash flow generation. Gross debt leverage remained 1.5 times and net debt leverage was 1.2 times. Our balance sheet remains strong with meaningful incremental capacity available to support growth. We are committed to maintaining our investment grade rating which Moody's reaffirmed with a stable outlook this quarter. During Q4, we amended our credit facilities to increase our overall revolver capacity from $1 billion to $1.5 billion and extend the maturity at more favorable pricing in the event of a draw. As of August 31st, our revolving credit facility was completely undrawn. This provides us with optionality as $500 million of notes with a 2.9% interest rate mature in March 2027 and increase strategic flexibility as we continue to grow. We expect to detail our multi-year shareholder value creation algorithm at our upcoming Investor Day, but before we do, I'll turn to our outlook for FY27. We expect another strong year with organic ASV growth of 5 to 6.5 percent during the fiscal year ahead. Clients use our intelligent solutions every day, and while there is no intrinsic seasonality, the natural renewal cycles and increasingly enterprise-oriented nature of our agreements suggests that growth may not progress smoothly quarter over quarter. Our revenue growth for FY27 is expected to be 5 to 6 percent on a reported basis and approximately 100 basis points higher on a like-for-like basis, reflecting a combination of factors, such as our exit from the ESG signals attribution business, FX rates, and other one-time items. Today, most of our recurring revenues are fixed subscriptions, but a growing portion is activity-linked and consumption-based. While these revenue streams add some variability to forecasting and subsequent revenue flow-through compared to traditional subscriptions, we are seeing accelerated client interest, particularly for emerging AI-driven offerings. We have not factored in any acceleration for FY27, given the early stages of AI transformation at our clients, and therefore, our actual revenue growth may diverge from ASV over time. We believe improving operating leverage provides a path to increased operating margins for the full fiscal year. We expect margin improvement in FY27 of between 25 and 75 basis points. Within this framework, we will continue to invest in initiatives to drive sustainable, profitable growth. While we don't manage to the margin in any given quarter, and the timing of various programs may cause some deviations from a linear progression through the year, we believe that FY26 operating margins represented a floor. We expect EPS growth to improve to the high single digits in FY27, despite two non-operating headwinds, specifically a higher tax rate, and incremental interest expense from the maturity of 2027 notes, which together, we estimate, represent an approximately 2% headwind to EPS growth. We intend to focus on growing our free cash flow and anticipate that free cash low per share should compound over time, reflecting both the strength of our foundation and the growth opportunity ahead. We look forward to providing further detail on our long-term strategy, client foundation, and multi-year outlook at our November 10th Investor Day and to seeing all of you there. With that, we look forward for your questions. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question. Our first question comes from the line of Alex Cram with UBS. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning, everyone. I want to actually ask about consolidating M&A. I know you mentioned some M&As in your script, but there were obviously headlines about one of your data and desktop competitors maybe having their business on the block and obviously details are limited but that transaction could include some proprietary data sets that you clearly lack so the question is look is something like that even feasible or interesting to you in this part of the cycle with all these uncertainties out there but consolidating obviously another player taking a lot of costs and maybe gaining some proprietary data in this kind of environment could be interesting so any general comments you can make would be appreciated thank you yeah thanks alex uh and good morning everyone uh thank you for the question um you know clearly we don't comment on uh competitors um but just to talk about our overall strategy i think we see tremendous growth opportunities organically um we are focused on investing and transforming our business into a high growth business with the right level of investment in growth in the foundational characteristics that continue to support the trust that clients have in us. And we have a very rich list of opportunities in front of us that we are absolutely focused on right now. That said, you know, we announced the BCC group acquisition. We've done other strategic investments throughout the year, and we have a clear framework for how we allocate our capital. When we look at opportunities that are high return can complement what we do organically, we certainly will consider and we are constantly looking at the market for all opportunities. The comment you made about proprietary data, we believe we are investing in significant amounts of data capabilities, expanding the proprietary data we already have and continuing to invest in the quality and the concordance and meshing our data with client data. That's our strategy. And of course, if there are opportunities to accelerate that, we'll be taking a look at it. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ashish Subhadra with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Thanks for taking my question. Really strong momentum in the ASV. I wanted to focus on the competitive environment. So Bloomberg launched their MCP offering yesterday. There have been a significant number of private companies with also MCP offerings. overall, the switching costs for MCP has gone down. So in this kind of a competitive environment where maybe some of the LLM providers are also bundling some private company provider, how does Paxset continue to differentiate and can you continue to sustain that strong sales momentum that you've seen? Thanks. Yeah, thanks, Ashish. We were leaders, as you all know, in innovating on how we deliver our data. We've done this historically as well, when the transition to APIs came about, we were early in that. When cloud shares started, we were again early in dat. And this is no different. We were one of the first to produce our data through an MCP server endpoint. The quality, the capabilities that we deliver through our MCP is standing out in the market, clearly. We get great feedback from our clients and our technology partners or even the frontier labs. So there is a lot of good feedback that comes back to us about the quality of our MCP delivery. The adoption you would see in the slides we just presented has scaled and continues to scale rapidly. Just this quarter, our adoption grew by 40% in terms of number of clients, and the usage is exponentially growing. It grew seven times this quarter over last quarter, and the last quarter grew 13 times from the prior quarter. So we continue to see a lot of traction, and I would say we are still at the early innings of this sort of long game because we've just made our first couple of dozen data sets available on MCP. There's hundreds more to go. More importantly, we are expanding well beyond data. When you think about MCP as a protocol through which capability is delivered, we're delivering more capabilities, whether it is skills tools analytics and these are all very well received by our clients as they are starting to adopt more agentic workflows the the bundling of data plus analytics plus capabilities is where we excel we we create really strong capabilities for our clients the context that they are able to harness through our platform uh gives them differentiated output when they use ai and that's where we are winning relative to the competition Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Shlomo Rosenbaum with Stifel. Your line is now open. Hi. Thank you very much. Hey, Sunok, I'm going to ask you a little bit for a sneak peek on some of the stuff you're planning to talk about on the analyst day. When we talked a few months ago, you were talking to me about rolling out an agentic workstation and things that looked like they were going to be more, you know, very much disruptive to the way people look at the workstation right now and sorry if you could just talk a little bit about you know some of the things that you're thinking about and you know what should people kind of expect who are regular users of back set and then if you don't mind Josh I know I'm always supposed to ask one question I just want to get the clarification on the growth in ASV from AI that was in the double digits was the growth portion from a and from AI just wanted to make sure that that was clear. Sorry if I'm sneaking in a second one. I'm not supposed to. Well, we'll give you a pass this time, Shlomo. Maybe I'll take the second one first and then Snoke hand it over to you for Investor Day. Yes, Snoke actually in the last question talked a bit about the adoption that we see, the utilization that we See, the early stages of monetization that we see, and specifically, that's right, with regard to our ASV that comes from our AI offerings, both for this quarter as well as for the previous quarter, we're very pleased to report that more than 10% of the ASVs that we added during the quarter came from our AI SKUs, new AI-enabled offerings. Terrific, and yes, it's going to be a lot of content on November 10th, so for those of you who are still on the fence, please do make it a point to come in person. There's also going to be a lot of product that we'll be showcasing, and nothing like touching and feeling the real product to get a feel for what's underway. Just to give you some color, we will go into the details of the FACSET intelligence strategy that we shared in the last quarter. um the that's now well uh developed uh there's lots of clients uh you know already using our products and uh to giving us rave reviews um it is as you said uh shlomo a real transition in the user experience um we are moving into a world where um workflows are transitioning from the traditional information consumption uh to human directed but agent executed workflows and the user experience has to correspondingly evolve, and that's what we'll be showcasing. We'll obviously share with you our strategy, our medium-term outlook, and our financial algorithm, and we look forward to discussing all of that in detail on November 10. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Faisal Alway with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Yes, hi, thank you. Good morning. I wanted to ask about the ASV guide for next year. I know, Josh, you talked about the fact that growth may not progress smoothly from quarter to quarter, and you are guiding through a deceleration from 26 into 27. So, I just wanted a bit more color on that and more specifically like did you have some you know pull forward of you know contracts in in 2026 or you know just any any any other commentary there would be helpful yeah good morning Pfizer thanks for that question look we had a terrific Q4 we executed really well and the performance was you know visible as as you can see we continue to have a robust diverse and proportionate pipeline um and we can we can confirm we did not pull forward anything into fi26 um it was just a you know a question of great execution that's that's what we demonstrated we continue to have great conversations our client dialogue is elevated we have broad-based strength across regions products and client types and um and as you said right there is a natural um cycle in our to our business it is second half weighted and we are just at a very early stages in the in a year with a full year of execution ahead of us and we prefer to guide to a range that we have high confidence in and let performance then you know drive any revisions in future quarters thank you our next question comes from the line of kelsey zoo with autonomous your line is now open hi good morning thanks for taking that question could you talk a little bit more about your acquisition of bcc group and how it fits into your overall strategy it's fact that basically extending more into the services layer for clients because if you look at what bccg offers it seems to provide the infrastructure layer between clients and different data providers so just curious to get a little bit more of your thoughts there thanks a lot yeah yeah thanks kelsey um it's It's an astute observation and an important one. As you all know, the real-time data distribution market is a large market. It's a mature market, and clients are keen to see new competition. They are excited with our offering, and we are continuing to invest in it and scale in it. We still have a small market share of a large TAM, and we see this acquisition as a real unlock in opening up a lot of new opportunities for us. to give you some color we worked with bcc group in a number of situations and we've had very successful implementations partnering with them we deliver the data they have the platform that orchestrates the distribution in the in the client environments and that's really important when you're trying to displace a large incumbents who have been in entrenched for many years we need a full stack solution that clients can use to almost turnkey switch over from existing situations to us. I wouldn't characterize it as a services business. It's a very high operating leverage technology business. it is about routing, it's about program execution, and it's about optimization of the endpoint delivery of data, which is very complex and intricate when it comes to real-time data feeds. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tony Kaplan with Morgan Stanley. Your one is now open. Thanks so much. I was hoping you could talk about your assessment of the large LLM competitors, what they're offering in financial services verticals, how deep you think they'll go, how you fit into that. You know, do you complement them with, you know, supplying data us through connectors and part or partnering or um you know just or do you just view them as competitors and and so just wanted to get a sense of maybe the ecosystem more broadly and and how you think that this plays out over the next few years thanks thanks tony um i i spoke about this a little while ago and i continue to believe that new frontier lab marketplaces are an incredible marketing channel for data for and specifically for facset they enable access to users that traditionally may not have direct connectivity or access to our workstations and or our data feeds so it's exactly the the motion that we're seeing in the market over the last several months we've seen a rapid adoption of our mcp those connectors activate new workloads at clients that are rolling out horizontal ai very quickly those clients realize that to get the full value of facet and the full volume of the depth and embeddedness that we have in the context we bring they start consuming more capabilities from us so it's a very complementary and symbiotic relationship we have with Frontier Labs. Could they compete with some of our work over time? Possibly, but we don't worry about that. We see plenty of opportunity to grow in partnership with them. The most important thing is, and clients are realizing this as they continue with their AI sort of adoption curve and maturity, that context really, really matters. To get the value out of AI, you have to activate the internal context get the best connected external context and then you get much much higher output out of the ai so that's what's driving the value towards us as um and that is exactly the strategy that we've been pursuing thank you our next question comes from the line of manav padnaik with barclays your line is now open thank you good morning I was hoping you could just maybe touch a little bit more on the margins you know you talked about the modernization of the infrastructure the cyber security etc like so where did those investments stand and I guess what I'm trying to get to is you know I think you mentioned this past year when you saw periods of faster ESV growth the margins were pressured so is will that you know be the case in 27 as well? Thanks, Manav. Yes, you know, margin clearly was a topic of great interest throughout FY26. And as we said earlier, you see a clear path to growth or improvement in margin in FY27. So let me just recap where we started this time last year. When I took charge here at FactSet, I noticed that we needed to make some foundational investments. There were some one-time investments that were important to make. I can give you a couple of examples. We moved from a single cloud provider to a multi-cloud provider framework, which gives us the resilience, the flexibility, and new capabilities. Now, that's a one-etime investment that is important to do, and it continues to bolster the trust and confidence clients have in our infrastructure another example is making the investments in changing our data to be machine ready that's a process that we had to start more or less as soon as i i got here and that's helped us achieve the success that we see in the data delivery through mcp again uh significant one-time investments that we don't expect to repeat in in in this year having said that, the more important, you know, capacity building that we've been doing throughout the last six to nine months through our productivity programs are really paying off. We've simplified the business. We have collapsed our different business units into a single unified product organization. That's reduced the complexity and interactions and reduced bureaucracy. Number two, we've really taken a hard look at our portfolio and we've exited businesses that we don't think we have the right to win in. And we've talked about that in prior quarters. And last, we are seeing real agentic adoption. And that is translating into operating leverage across different parts of the business, engineering, client support, as well as in our data collection, data refinery. So all of this is translating Into growing operating leverage and returning you know, the business to the operating leverage that it should have, which gives us the capacity to make the investments we need to continue to make in growth opportunities. And we'll continue to do that and still return some to the bottom line, which will show up in margin. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Nicholas with William Blair. Your line is now open. Hi, good morning. Appreciate you taking my question. In your prepared remarks, you mentioned a bunch of wins that included competitive displacement. Just wondering if you could speak to the biggest themes or drivers on those wins, particularly with the functionality, breadth, price. And then somewhat relatedly, we're hearing a lot more about the importance of implementation expertise among InfoServices firms. Does that become a potential area for differentiation going forward, kind of being able to bring people inside your client organizations to help them integrate this data, integrate your technologies and your capabilities, or is that not as big a part of the opportunity going forward? Thank you. Thanks. I'll start with that second part first and then address the broader point about our broad competitive positioning. You're absolutely right that implementation and I would say context engineering in the in the domain that we are deploying our solutions is really important. We have this real strong capability internally of the Faxit consulting teams that have been built up over the years. We view them as absolutely our forward deployed experts who are working with our clients every day. They understand deeply the end user workflows and therefore any agentic implementations we do with them are that much faster, that much more effective. And we get the ROI on it very, very quickly. So that's a real advantage and it's absolutely working for us. That is then a segue into the broader competitive positioning for us. We have, as you know, a full stack approach. We clearly have our data capabilities. We have analytics capabilities, and we have workflow capabilities. At each level in that stack, we have also direct clients who consume any one of those layers of the stack. But many clients prefer to take the full stack, and they consume it in different ways. And that's resonating with clients because the flexibility that we are offering to have an open architecture approach, unbundled approach where clients can pick and choose and meet our analytics, our data and our solutions where they want us to meet them. That's really resonating. And that'S a real differentiator in the market relative to other competitors. To give you a little bit more color, we've had very good success in competitive displacements across all client types. In banking, we had one anecdote I can give you is a really blue chip private equity firm that was really excited about our MCP offering, but in the first instance decided to stick with an incumbent just because of the challenges in displacement. but three months later they were back with us and they did a complete displacement of a long-standing incumbent. In another large regional bank example, we had a tremendous relationship with them on their wealth management side and that allowed us to do a complete replacement of a competitor across their capital markets business. On the buy side, hedge funds are really excited to consume our data through MCP. That's a fast-growing segment for us, and that's allowing us to really displace some traditional competitors in the fixed income markets that we historically struggle to displace. So these are just a few examples that I thought, Andrew, might be helpful to color. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Curtis Nagel with Bank of America. your line is now open uh great thank you for taking a question um so yeah you guys thought uh you know a little pretty pretty solid issue of currencies and mcps i think it's 650 you know 200 plus quarter of a quarter um would you be able to break out just you know what the proportion is paid versus trial and you know i guess how those conversion rates compared to 3q you um it's uh i'd say it's broadly comparable in terms of the conversion pipeline um so we we have a very uh fast-moving pipeline in mcp where you start with the initial uh sort of trial then it moves into uh larger scale trials and very quickly then converts into larger contracts and often the contracts then expand into workstation discussions broader agentic flow discussions and and the like so the the the pipeline is very active the conversion rates are strong the best example I can give you is again you know we see five and six figure deals regularly like multiple deals a week and just you know maybe a bit of color since since the numbers we just published on the slide to today again we've seen an expansion of at least another 20%. So, just gives you a sense of the pace of the pickup in the market. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Scott Wurzel with Wolf Research. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning, guys, and thank you for taking my question. Just wanted to ask on the remarks you had made around the kind of consumption-based pricing with some of your AI-related products and just wondering if there's any color you can give on sort of how the mix is between consumption-based and subscription-based pricing with AI-related products and if it is more, is it more product-driven or more client preference-driven? I'd color that with a gray. Thanks. Yeah, I'll start by saying it's very, very early days in the industry's transition from subscriptions to subscription plus consumption. We certainly have contracts that are now clearly geared towards that, but I would say it's super early days. And is it, you know, your question around what drives it, it's largely driven by, I would Say, what makes for a flexible yet somewhat predictable economic structure for the client. So clients have a preference when they start, But inevitably, as they understand the dynamics and they see the product range and as the contract negotiations progress, we largely end up in a structure where clients like to have somewhat predictable, fairly large subscription base, which comes with a certain amount of volume of data or agentic capability that they can consume. And above that, you kick into volume-based tiers that then becomes consumption-led. So that's the structure. Generally, we are broadly seeing the industry gravitate to that structure. But as I said, the data of consumption driven pricing and the volumes of that is still very, very early. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Craig Huber with Huber Research Partners. Your line is now open. great thank you given investors concerns in recent months recent quarters around ai is it possible for you guys to quantify how much you think ai is helping your revenue and then separately how much ai in net investments is benefiting your your profits that's my main question i do have a housekeeping question if i could squeeze this in because you changed the definition here. Your intangible asset amortization add back of 85 to 97 million includes some extra discrete items. I'm curious, what is just the pure intangable asset amorterization add back you're thinking for fiscal 27? Thank you. Hey, Craig. Good to hear from you. It's Josh. I mean, just to be blunt on that last one, we've consolidated all of our items purely for simplicity's sake, as far as non-cash items, just to give you the reporting in a format that's simpler and more consumable. With regard to AI and its contribution, like we said earlier, with regard to the ASV added during the course of the year, if we think about what is directly AI and really a net new product offering from FactSet, that constituted about 10 percent, a little more than 10% of our Q4 flow, as it were, of the 86 million of ASV generated during the quarter. We continue to think that that's an exciting opportunity for us. We can continue to see that in the early innings, as Snoke mentioned, every client is on a different stage of their own AI journey. And we're, of course, looking to AI to the other part of your question with regard to how to operate as efficiently and as effectively as possible Snoke mentioned in his remarks some growth in our own token consumption both in the actual amount of tokens consumed and in our spending around our tokens and it's an area that we are monitoring quite actively and in in our minds quite robustly Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jason Haas with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning, and thanks for taking my question. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on what you think the staying power of MCP is. We've heard that some of the newer AI models don't necessarily need to use MCP. They can use just traditional APIs. I was curious if you're seeing that? Do you think MCP will maybe be a passing trend or is it here to stay? Thank you. Yeah, it's an interesting question, Jason, and it's, again, very early days. I would argue that model characteristics broadly, right, beyond how they consume data, it continues to evolve. We've seen a swathe of new model types come out in the last few weeks, which is exciting. Some of them are very efficient in certain dimensions and not as efficient as large language models and other dimensions. So we keep a close watch on all of this and we are prepared for the trends to evolve in any direction because we do have APIs. We do have cloud shares. We deliver data in multiple different formats and we're prepared for that eventuality. A large part of our uh innovation here comes from partnering closely with the the frontier labs as well as with new model providers open weight models etc and that innovation will continue to help us as as we navigate this ai diffusion across the industry thank you our next question comes from the line of peter knudson with evercore isi your line is not open hi good morning thanks for taking my question one thing I've heard from a few different companies now is the importance of maintaining a closeness in the relationship with the client specifically sort of an understanding how they're using the respective data you know what they're doing with it and I guess learning what is needed and sort of creating a feedback loop with the clients so I'm just wondering you know as you you know talked about increasing you know a shift towards direct data fees and apis you know how might that you know be impacted and to what degree is fax set still able to gather the same level of information from the client usage as historically thanks yeah that's a great question and yeah i would just encourage everybody to think about the the user base itself evolving from human use to a hybrid of human and agent use and agents don't need a graphic user interface like a terminal or a workstation to understand what's happening and that's where the apis the mcp the various tools that we offer to agents who are the consumers really help and we have the telemetry we have feedback loops and we continue to reinforce our context at our layer so it's a it's an absolutely important point uh the human context accumulates through our human interfaces which happen to be the workstation and various other you know front-end platforms and the agent context continues to accumulate through agent calls through apis and through mcp on our estate on our data estate on analytics estate and our software estate Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Surrender's Den with Jeffrey, so your line is now open. Thank you, Snoop. Can you maybe talk a little bit about your product development capabilities and how that's changed over the past year in the sense of maybe headcount versus the total budget that you use, including token costs to kind of build products um and then maybe the impact of speed of market and then just ultimately like how much more can you deliver now and then how much of that can actually be absorbed by your clients relative to last year broadly george i'd say absorption is a function of the maturity levels of different clients and i think that's certainly evolving and we see some very sophisticated clients moving very very fast and there is a sort of a big middle where there's lots of experimentation but also you know significant legacy infrastructure that has to be wrangled in order to drive the um the adoption of ai um and then there are um there's a very long tail right we have over 9 000 clients widely distributed around the world so you see a range of client maturities this is back to your question about our product development we are very geared towards supporting that range of clients we're working with clients of all types we have capabilities not just in terms of releasing a product but as i said earlier our consultants who can then adapt the product provide the right kind of solution in a specific context so it's the full stack approach that we take and that's helping us drive the adoption curve. Internally, how we are organized and the first part of your question is we have simplified ourselves. We've got a simplified, unified product organization that's driving pace, that's driving clarity of vision, that'S driving greater sharing and collaboration internally inside the company. And net-net, I'd say the capacity of all of that is translating into shipping products faster and better. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of George Tong with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Hi, thanks. Good morning. I wanted to go back to your organic ASV growth guide. You noted that the pipeline is robust and confirmed there was no pull forward into fiscal 2026. Can you talk about the key swing factors that would determine whether organic ASP growth finishes near the low versus the high end of the five to six and a half percent guidance range sure um happy to take that question george look george what i would say to that is just overall you know as you know um it's early in the year we have uh call it 11 months of execution execution to play out what you saw both in q4 and really for the full year 2026 was excellent execution And as we thought about our outlook for 27, our goal, both Snokes, myself, we believe in providing transparency both into our operations and our outlook. And what we've endeavored to provide is a guidance that is both data-based and prudent based on what we see. And like I said, you saw from the outperformance in Q4 that many of our renewals tend to be back half-weighted. So I wouldn't expect a, call it linear progression throughout the year, but those were some of the factors that went into our thinking. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Henry Hayden with Rothschild & Koch Redburn. Your line is now open. yeah hi everyone thanks for having us on um so no i believe on the last call you mentioned that around 20 of the top 100 clients are using mcp on a paid basis we're hoping to get some color on the incremental uplift in spend that you're seeing from those that are and the extent to which you're currently charging a premium for mcb data connectors versus non-mcp data feeds thanks yeah we don't call out that specific metric but i can give you some color around it which is our mcp delivery to all of those top clients is typically bundled with a whole host of other capabilities it tends to include traditional data feeds it tends zu include additional data feeds and it tends tu include a combination of workstations and various other analytic solutions uh on the whole uh when workstation users start consuming mcp from us and that's uh we've seen a significant trend of that uh we have seen that they grow faster with us on average i think the majority of workstation uses that have taken mcb from us have grown anywhere from 20 to 50 more in terms of their overall asp with us thank you our next question is from the line of ashish sabadra with rbc capital markets your line is now open thanks for taking my follow-up question i just had a quick modeling question around about below the line items i was just wondering if you could comment on what how should we think about the tax rate for fiscal year 27 as well as interest expense thank you Two questions there, and we tried to size it as a 2% growth headwind, so call it between $0.30 and $0,40 of earnings per share, given the $18.01 that we delivered in FY26. But on tax rates, look, the effective tax rate was approximately 19% for FY26, it was approximately 18% for FY25. I would think it's reasonable to forecast a slightly higher tax rate going into FY27, And then on the interest expense, as I noted, we have $500 million of notes maturing in March, and we're going to be opportunistic in the capital markets and assessing opportunities. I think it's reasonable to assume that we refinance those at higher rates than the 2.9% cost of carry, given that we're just in a different interest rate regime than we were five years ago when those notes were issued. I noted also, Ashish, that we de-risked that maturity through our revolver upsize and operated a very conservative leverage ratio, but all in, we're committed to maintaining our investment grade status, but think of those, call it below-the-line items, as about 2% headwinds on our earnings per share outlook for FY27. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Shlomo Rosenbaum. The line is now open. Hi, Ruth. Thank you very much for taking a follow-up from me as well. I just wanted to ask a little bit, some of the weight on margins came from execution on ASV growth in the incentive comp. I'm just wondering with more consumption-based pricing, is the company thinking about different metrics in terms of overall incentive-based comp being maybe more weighted on overall revenue versus ASV? Because as you talked about, Josh, we could see a divergence between ASV growth and revenue growth. And I was wondering if ASV is going to be the right way to be incentivizing uh you know the level levels of management and the company going forward thanks lomo that's an important question um i'll start out by saying we made tremendous progress throughout fi26 in optimizing our incentive design and the results speak for themselves we we have a very good design in place it rewards our teams appropriately and will continue to have a structure that is high value for us. We are going to continue to optimize that design. You know, we have lots of levers, one of which you just described, which is as the rise of consumption-based pricing, how does that impact incentives? But there's plenty of other dimensions that we need to optimize on. We're well on that path. We have a new workforce transformation officer who just joined us, D. Herji, and we have a lot of work underway to continue to improve on our incentive design and that will play through into how we talk about our you know our payouts in the next few quarters as well and if i could shlomo what i might add is look we look we looked at a range of metrics but we continue to believe that asv is the best available forward indicator of the revenue for the next 12-month period so we we look at a range of matrix that we manage the company with that we report to you on um and again we believe that asv is an important metric of our go forward go forward productivity and delivery thank you our last question comes from the line of alex cram with ubs your line is now open yeah hey hello again uh just a very quick follow-up on the uh asv outlook um if i heard you correctly i think um obviously asv's second half waited so maybe a little bit conservatism here at this stage but can you also just very quickly talk about the near-term momentum because the one queue sometimes can be um you know tough i think in prior years we've had it's even negative so given some of the mcp momentum you had do you do you feel confident in you know year-over-year growth um on a dollar basis in organic asb or or uh or anything you would highlight in terms of the near-term momentum and pipeline, specifically for 1Q. Thanks. Well, maybe I'll turn to Sanok specifically for the pipeline and how we're trending toward the first quarter. But what I would say is for the year, look, Alex, as you noted, we're coming off a record quarter. We're coming off of a record year. That's a reflection of outstanding execution. And when you think about our ASV guidance, maybe relative to guidance that FACSAT has given previously, this guidance is higher and tighter than what FactSet has provided in the last two years. So think of it as a narrower range. Think of it as a higher objective. And we base that on the data that we see based on the quality of the pipeline that we are looking at. Yeah. And I mean, as I said, the pipeline is robust. It's diverse. It'S proportionate. And the AI strategy is really resonating. So the MCP growth continues. I mentioned how just even in the month since the close of the quarter, it's continuing to accelerate. So yeah, we feel very confident about the quarter at this point in the cycle, Alex. Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to hand the call back over to Sanok Vishwanathan for closing remarks. Thank you all again for joining us today. Robust growth, strengthening commercial performance and measurable productivity gained position us well for the fiscal year ahead. Before we close, I want to thank every FACS header for their continued dedication and commitment to delivering for our clients. We remain focused on executing against our strategic priorities that I've talked about in the past three quarters, and I look forward to providing more comprehensive view of our long-term strategy and growth opportunities at our Investor Day on November 10. Operator, this concludes today's call. Thank you. This concludes todays conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.